🫏 Is 2 Tank Vs Tiger

IS-2 Heavy Tank. The Russian IS-2 proved superior to the German Panther medium tank and able to hold its own against the Tiger I and II heavies. By the fall of 1942 the Red Army regarded its 47-ton KV-1 (Kliment Voroshilov) heavy tank as much of a failure as the Soviet defense commissar for whom it was named. Aside from (or perhaps due to) its Ukrainian leaders, with an eye on the tough battles widely assumed to lie ahead in the spring, had urged Germany to send its vaunted tank, the Leopard 2. Berlin resisted . 18 km/h (11 mph) (average road speed) [1] Panzerkampfwagen VIII Maus (English: 'mouse') was a German World War II super-heavy tank completed in late 1944. It is the heaviest fully enclosed armored fighting vehicle ever built. Five were ordered, but only two hulls and one turret were completed, the turret being attached before the testing Also, the IS-2 tanks had to fight against the German heavy tanks "Tiger I" and "Tiger II", with which the lighter Soviet tank could fight on equal terms. The IS-2 was used in almost all military Super pershing vs IS-2 1944 vs Tiger II. Since the super pershing is now 6.3, it's realy not that bad, even though i don't have the is-2 i still think the super pershing is slightly better than is 2 and also the tiger ii which i have played for a while. I think the good thing about the pershing is it's lowered repair cost (it's minor but it Original tiger probably $10-20 million. I saw a panzer IV go for $2.4 million. That's completely original. If you tried to recreate the parts I say $1-2.5 million maus $2-3 million. You would need to get blueprints wich to get I am assuming you would hire someone to get (I have tried myself it is terrible). The topic of Sherman vs. Tiger is one of the most consistently popular ones that comes up during the discussion of WWII armoured warfare. Despite the years that have passed, such simple questions as "at what range can a Sherman penetrate the Tiger's armour" can get results ranging from "point blank" to "not at all". Comparing: IS-2 vs. Tiger I. Built in 1944, the IS-2 (IS-122) heavy tank was a modification of the IS-1. It featured a simple cast glacis plate. Elite Soviet Guards heavy tank regiments used the IS-2 extensively in the assaults on the fortress cities of Budapest, Breslau, and Berlin. Watch Fury Now: http://AAN.SonyPictures.com/FuryWith Norman's (Logan Lerman) help, Fury destroys the Tiger by outmaneuvering it and firing into its thinner r The armour of the IS-2 (1944) (China) is fitting for a heavy tank, with enough thickness to ward off most incoming shots. However, there are lots of weak points present that enemy guns can readily penetrate, namely the lower glacis and the turret front, the latter which presents only 100 mm of armour if the incoming shell hits at a 0 degree impact angle. If you mean production numbers, it's more like 49 to every tiger. 2.5 to 1 combat effective, 5 to 1 production effective. Tiger wasnt that good. That whole "It takes 5 Shermans to kill a single Tiger" myth started in Normandy, because so many of the after action reports described a fight between approx 5 Shermans and a single Tiger. of course there are other tanks with this problem, but i just wanted to highlight the amazing penetration of the tiger 2 h on some russian tanks needs pixel perfect shots that are a bit too much to ask. i do have the jumbo, both the 75 and 76, and they do certanly suffer a lot against some german/russian vehicles ljX5.

is 2 tank vs tiger